Question by Abraham: Parents are too soft (figuratively and literally) is this why we require legislation banning fast food?
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/ipad-application/mums-and-dads-are-too-soft/story-fn6bfmgc-1225948531667
I pity fat individuals,
Best answer:
Answer by Proud member of the party of NO!
I pitty ignorant douchebags.
Give your answer to this question below!
Survival of the fittest. If you want to be a bad parent and feed your kid crap, then that’s your choice.
It’s San Francisco for gods sake. This is a special case! No they don’t know how to raise kids, they have needle injection sites and exchanges!
It won’t be long before we have a ministry of plenty.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l46t_nrySg4
No.
And for the umpteenth time, San Francisco did NOT ban fast food, they did NOT ban Happy Meals.
Let’s be clear on one thing: the proposed San Francisco city ordinance does not BAN fast food.
What it does is prohibit restaurants from including toys in kids meals which do not meet certain nutritional requirements. What that means is McDonalds and other fast food restaurants could not use the promise of a toy – often tied to a popular movie – as a lure to get kids to get their parents to buy them crap food.
The proposed ordinance would not prohibit McDonalds from selling Happy Meals, or from doing movie tie-ins. It would only prohibit the toy in the meal if it does not meet certain nutritional guidelines.